Hello, late in writing coursework ? Don't worry I know who can help you !Trusted Academic Service
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue (https://owl.english.purdue). When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom.
This resource will help you begin the process of understanding literary theory and schools of criticism and how they are used in the academy.
At its most basic level, reader response criticism considers readers' reactions to literature as vital to interpreting the meaning of the text. However, reader-response criticism can take a number of different approaches. A critic deploying reader-response theory can use a psychoanalytic lens, a feminists lens, or even a structuralist lens. What these different lenses have in common when using a reader response approach is they maintain ". that what a text is cannot be separated from what it does" (Tyson 154).
Tyson explains that ". reader-response theorists share two beliefs: 1) that the role of the reader cannot be omitted from our understanding of literature and 2) that readers do not passively consume the meaning presented to them by an objective literary text; rather they actively make the meaning they find in literature" (154). In this way, reader-response theory shares common ground with some of the deconstructionists discussed in the Post-structural area when they talk about "the death of the author," or her displacement as the (author)itarian figure in the text.
Here is a list of scholars we encourage you to explore to further your understanding of this theory: